- Activism & Organizing
- Arts & Culture
- Books, Literature & Ideas
- Business
- Critical Thinking
- Economics
- Foreign Affairs
- Gender & Sexuality
- Government
- Health & Environment
- Human Rights & Civil Liberties
- Labor
- Law & Justice
- Media
- Peace & Nonviolence
- Race & Ethnicity
- Religion & Spirituality
- Youth & Education
Jonathan Tasini, Working Life
Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Ken Mitchell
Where does a politician, or a political party, draw the line in the willingness to sacrifice principles for a few bucks? When we talk about the need to "change" the political environment and the culture of money and politics, isn't there some place where you can say, "right here, this is the perfect example and we aren't going to let this go on anymore"? I would argue that the place to draw the line is the relationship between the Democratic Party and Wal-Mart. And the time to draw the line is now.
I outline the facts in a moment. But, the premise for the need to draw the line now is this: There may be no corporation in American today that has been a more persistent, regular violator of the law than Wal-Mart. There may be no corporation in America that has been as virulently anti-union as Wal-Mart, firing workers repeatedly for trying to organize. There may be no corporation in America that has attacked the rights of workers and undercut the living standards of Americans more than Wal-Mart.

Recent comments
24 weeks 5 days ago